Regular Meeting
Davis Joint USD
June 04, 2015 5:30PM
Closed Session - 5:30 p.m., South Conference Room, 526 B Street;
Open Session - 7:00 p.m., Community Chambers, 23 Russell Boulevard
Davis, CA 95616
| The mission of Davis Joint Unified School District, a leading center of educational innovation, is to ignite a love of learning and equip each student with the knowledge, skills, character, and well-being to thrive and contribute to an evolving and increasingly-connected world, through a system characterized by:
- Optimal conditions and environments for all students to learn
- A team of talented, resourceful, and caring staff
- Transforming teaching, learning, and operations in our continuing pursuit of excellence
- Resourceful, transparent, and responsible fiscal planning,
- A diverse and inclusive culture |
| |
|
| It is anticipated the Board will reconvene in open session at 7:00 p.m. |
|
|
| Board Member Madhavi Sunder will lead those attending the meeting in a patriotic observance. |
|
|
In the interest of conducting the business of public education in a timely manner, there is a two or three-minute limit per individual speaker which, at the discretion of the board president, may be modified depending on the number of speakers. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes for the comment period may be imposed.
During this public comment period, the law does not allow the Board of Education to take action on any item not explicitly posted on the agenda in advance. However, Board members may ask for clarification, refer concerns to staff, and/or request that an item be placed on a future agenda.
|
|
|
Classified Personnel Report 21-15 covers 1 Employment, 1 Promotion, and possible addendum covering 2 Employments, 5 Resignations and 10 Variable Services Agreements.
|
The personnel actions requested in this report are essential to meet the goals and mission of the Davis Joint Unified School District.
|
| |
The personnel actions are budgeted for in the Davis Joint Unified School District Adopted Budget or expressly approved by the Board of Education in open session.
|
Classified Personnel Report - Addendum A
Classified Personnel Report No. 21-15
|
|
| 
|
|
Approve the appointment of the Superintendent/Designees as the District's CIF representatives for the 2015-2016 School Year.
|
Each year the Board must appoint the District representatives to the Sac-Joaquin Section of the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF). The Superintendent is the staff person to whom the Board normally delegates its authority and who represents the Boards as chief administrator of the District. The Superintendent usually designates the high school principal and two selected high school staff members as his designees.
The California Interscholastic Federation Form with the 2015-2016 Designation of CIF Representatives to the league is attached.
|
| |
Form to record District or School Representatives
|
|
|
Approve the staff recommendation to approve the Certificated School Counselor Job Description
|
| With the addition of permanent Elementary Counseling positions the position of school counselor needed to be defined in relation to the other existing counseling positions. |
| |
| None at this time. |
DJUSD School Counselor Job Description
|
|
|
Conduct the first reading of Board Policy 3311. The Board may vote to waive the second reading and approve BP 3311 as presented.
|
| Board Policy establishes working parameters and sets standards and criteria whereby DJUSD employees interact internally and externally, and carry out daily operational practices. |
| |
Board Policy 3311, as written, does not have a financial impact on the DJUSD. |
BP 3311 - Bids
|
|
|
Accept the proposed policy amendments and modifications to the Board Policies as a first reading; waive the second reading; and approve the Board Policies.
|
As part of the CSBA Board Policy services, CSBA prepares comprehensive updates on a quarterly basis to insure compliance with statutory changes and obligations, as well as the welfare of school districts. By following CSBA guidelines, the attached policies incorporate new local and federal mandates, the repeal of statutes, and new laws, and have been reviewed by staff, legal counsel if appropriate, and the board policy subcommittee. The attached Policy Guidesheet summarizes the CSBA recommended changes.
The following Board Policies are presented:
BP 0440 Technology Plan
BP 5125 Student Records
BP 5141.4 Child Abuse Prevention and Reporting
BP 5141.21 Administering Medications
BP 5144.1 Suspension and Expulsions
BP 6158 Independent Study
BP 6162 .51 State Academic Tests
BP 6173.1 Education for Foster Youth
|
| |
BP 0440
BP 5125
BP 5141.21
BP 5141.4
BP 6158
BP 6173.1
|
|
|
Ratify the contracts and agreements as presented.
|
Pursuant to Board Policy and California Education Code, all contracts and agreements need to be approved and ratified by the Board of Education. The following are the current contracts and agreements which are being presented to the Board for ratification:
Artstor Digital Library
Naviance, Inc.
|
| |
Artstor Digital Library Agreement
Naviance, Inc.
|
|
|
| Approve the contract with Youth Truth to provide a district-wide climate survey for students grades 3-12 starting in the Fall of 2015. |
The DJUSD Local Control Accountability Plan Goal 6 states that the district will:
•Conduct a district-wide climate assessment to obtain base line climate data. •The school culture/climate tool will have particular focus on cultural attributes that correlate to success of student groups identified in the LCAP. The DJUSD Strategic Plan Goal 3 Specific Result D states that the district will: Assess, build and support school culture to bolster academic success and connectedness. •Action steps include: –Form a district task force made up of representatives of teachers, administrators, parents, and middle and high school students to select and develop district-wide and site-based school culture assessment tools. –Research and select school culture assessment tools so district can tap into best practices and experience of school culture improvement. Particular focus should be on cultural attributes that correlate to success of groups identified in the LCAP. This may lead to policy recommendations to the Board of Education. District and schools identify characteristics of a healthy school culture based on research. –Conduct district-wide assessments to obtain base line results and share with stake holder groups (parents, students, teachers, administrators, school board) and help identify issues and assets. –District leadership and staff examine results of district-wide school culture assessments and report results both on a district-wide and school-specific basis. The contract with Youth Truth will begin the baseline assessment of student climate perception. |
| |
| $22,500 annually from the general fund. |
Youth Truth Agreement
|
|
|
Approve the agreement between Davis Joint Unified School District and School Services of California, Inc. of $2,760 annually.
|
School Services, Inc. will provide information relating to issues of school finance, legislation, school budgeting, and general fiscal issues. District staff will receive publications containing information on practices that impact school district fiscal policies. Additionally, staff and the Board will have access to the School Services internet website regarding major school finance and policy issues.
Staff has reviewed the agreement and believes that the agreement provisions and the proposed cost are reasonable. This agreement reflects a price increase of $180 over the previous agreement. It is recommended that the Board approve the contract for School Services of California, Inc. for the period of one year beginning July 1, 2015 and terminating June 30, 2016.
|
| |
Included in the annual budget for business professional services at a cost of $2,760.
|
School Services of California, Inc. Agreement for Special Services
|
|
|
Approve Summer Food Service Agreement with United Way California Capital Region. This agreement allows Davis Joint Unified School District the ability to become a vendor preparing meals from June 15, 2015 to August 14, 2015.
|
United Way California Capital Region is a sponsor for the Summer Food Service Program with no facility to produce meals. The United Way CCR has requested that the Davis Joint Unified School District prepare meals for their summer program and deliver the meals to the Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services in Sacramento, CA. Davis Joint Unified School District will be preparing and delivering 500 Lunches and Snacks daily. The summer program, this year, will assist in the finalization of a three-year agreement with United Way CCR as a vendor for their After School At-Risk program during the regular school year.
|
| |
The fiscal impact will be $66,375 generated for Fund 13.
|
Summer Food Service Agreement with United Way
|
|
|
| Approve Resolution 44-15 for purchase of equipment, professional services, and installation of wireless infrastructure and access points in three schools across the District. (QUEST) |
| Per the DJUSD Strategic Plan, the district will install wireless network access and switch upgrades in three schools between June-August 2015: Strategy 2: We will develop and implement a plan for physical space and technology infrastructure required to achieve our objectives and mission. Specific Result 2a: Install wireless that will provide comprehensive coverage for a high-density environment at all DJUSD Campuses. Year Two, Step 2: Implement wireless in a second 1/3 of the district locations giving priority to the Junior High Schools. The DJUSD technology department solicited California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) bids from CMAS-approved contractors to configure and install wireless networks, and secured Cisco equipment under the bid limit determined by the Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA). Based on several criteria including pricing, company experience, history/knowledge of the District, ability to meet objectives of the District, site visits, and references, the DJUSD selected Quest Media & Supplies, Inc. to manage the project described below. - Wireless installation and infrastructure upgrade in every interior building at Emerson Junior High, Harper Junior High and Holmes Junior High
Quest will provide project management, equipment, network engineering time, and installation of access points on school campuses.
|
| |
| The fiscal impact is $525,000. Last year, the total amount spent on wireless implementation was $440,000. The portion allocated for this phase with three comprehensive sites equals $525,000, to include replacement core switch upgrades of $48,000 for the three sites. All funding was anticipated, and is included in the current budget projections as part of our multi-year planning. |
Resolution No. 44-15 Wireless Network Upgrade
|
|
|
Approve Resolution No. 50-15 Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of a Site Lease, Sublease Agreement, Construction Services Agreement, and Other Acts Relating to the Re-Roofing and Painting Project at Emerson Jr. High School.
|
| Abide Builders, Inc. has been selected as the primary lease-leaseback entity to enter into negotiations and execute a Site Lease, Sublease, and Construction Services Agreements with a Guaranteed Maximum Sum to complete the re-roofing and exterior painting at the Emerson Jr. High School Campus. Negotiations of the Site Lease and Sublease Agreements and Guaranteed Maximum Sum (GMP) of $1,878,110 is complete and in order for execution by the District. Within the GMP, the District will carry an $80,000 contingency value for unforeseen conditions and/or for other District directed additional scope of work.
All documentation has been reviewed and approved by District legal counsel. |
| |
| The execution of the plans and specifications and lease-leaseback documents will have no fiscal impact on the General Fund. Funding for the total project will be through Deferred Maintenance Funding and paid for by the COP borrowing for restricted facilities funds specifically for these projects. |
1. Resolution No. 50-51 Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of a Site Lease, Sublease Agreement, and Construction Services Agreement, and Other Ac
2. LLB Site Lease for Emerson Roofing and Painting Project
3. LLB Sublease for Emerson Roofing and Painting Project
4. LLB Construction Service Agreement for the Emerson Roofing and Painting Project
|
|
|
Approve Resolution No. 51-15 Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of a Site Lease, Sublease Agreement, Construction Services Agreement, and Other Acts Relating to the Construction of Da Vinci Charter Academy Administration Portable Building & Main Gym Bleacher Replacement Project at Emerson Jr. High School.
|
| Abide Builders, Inc. has been selected as the primary lease-leaseback entity to enter into negotiations and execute a Site Lease, Sublease Agreement, and Construction Services Agreement with a Guaranteed Maximum Sum, to complete the Da Vinci Charter Academy Administration Portable Building and Main Gym Bleacher Replacement Project. This includes, but is not limited to; interior building improvements, site work, demolition of existing gym bleachers, site preparation and utilities for the new portable building at the Emerson Jr. High School Campus. Negotiations of the Site Lease and Sublease Agreement, and Guaranteed Maximum Sum (GMP) of $270,839 are complete and in order for execution by the District. Within this GMP, the District will carry a $15,000 contingency value for unforeseen conditions and/or for other District directed additional scope of work. All documentation has been reviewed and approved by District legal counsel. |
| |
| The execution of the plans and specifications and lease-leaseback documents will have no fiscal impact on the General Fund. Funding for the total project will be through Developer Fees and Deferred Maintenance Funding and paid for by the COP borrowing for restricted facilities funds specifically for these projects. |
1. Resolution No. 51-15 Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of a Site Lease, Sublease Agreement, and Construction Services Agreement, and Other Ac
2. LLB Site Lease for the Da Vinci Charter Academy Administration Portable Building and Bleacher Replacement Project.
3. LLB Sub Lease for the Da Vinci Charter Academy Administration Portable Building and Bleacher Replacement Project.
4. LLB Construction Service Agreement for the Da Vinci Charter Academy Administration Portable Building and Bleacher Replacement Project.
|
|
|
| Receive a grant from the Davis School Arts Foundation. |
Davis School Arts Foundation (DSAF) President, Tara Diel along with Rebecca Breitbard, Vice President, and Julie Cuetera, Treasurer, will present a check to the Davis Joint Unified School District in the amount of $22,508.50 The funds represent the contribution made in partnership with the Davis Joint Unified School District to support the ongoing efforts at the school sites to enhance and encourage the arts in the schools. The district matches the DSAF donation with funding and in-kind services. The combined DSAF, in-kind services and DJUSD funding of $45,017 was distributed to school sites and staff members who were awarded grants for the Arts Vision, Brunelle Harmony, Hershberger Visual and Performing Arts, Secondary Harmony Choral, and Watermelon Gumball Grants. These grants supported various projects in numerous classrooms across our schools. A binder is available in Instructional Services for viewing the project evaluation for these grants.
|
| |
| These funds go directly to support Arts Education in the Davis School District. |
DSAF-DJUSD Budget 2014-15
|
|
|
| Approve staff recommendation to udpate the AIM Master Plan retesting policies in order to provide fair and appropriate opportunities for student AIM identification, one or more retesting options to be used in circumstances for which the universal testing may have hindered performance.
Additionally, the Superintendent is seeking Board input regarding the priority topic(s) for the 2015-16 school year *Review and Update the Screening Process (implementation of Risk Factors) *Additional limitations on private testing (clarified and/or new language) *Adjustment of eligibility score (considering the impact on underrepresented) *Impacts of the Lottery/Placement Procedures *Number of sites *Junior High School AIM program/High Achieving program
|
The district, due to the financial crisis, experienced a reduction in AIM staff and as a result the sole test utilized for re-screening of students who may qualify for AIM was the Test of Non-Verbal Intelligence (TONI). The district believes that a more broad scope of testing options available during the re-screening process will achieve the goal of providing a more fair and appropriate opportunity for AIM identification.
Purpose statement:
In order to provide fair and appropriate opportunities for AIM identification, one or more retesting options will be used in circumstances for which the universal testing may have hindered performance. The district will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the assessment system. Universal Testing
The district will continue to use the OLSAT 8 as the universal testing assessment for all 3rd grade DJUSD students whose parents do not opt them out. Retesting
If a student would benefit from more than one of the retesting options below, the district staff will determine the most appropriate retest. For students who would benefit from a non-verbal test and whose circumstances (income level, parent ed, SPED, primary language, OLSAT score-discrepancy in verbal/non-verbal scores) may have hindered their performance on the OLSAT 8, the district will consider administration of the TONI. For students who would benefit and whose circumstances (discrepancy in verbal/non-verbal scores) may have hindered their performance on the OLSAT 8, the district may consider the administration of the Slosson R3, which is a subset of the WISC. For students in the standard error of measure (+/- 5 percentile), the district will consider the administration of the Slosson R3. Additional resources are required to provide 1-on-1 testing (WISC, DAS, Kauffman, Woodcock Johnson III, Slossen R3, or any other multi-domain mental reasoning test or any test that needs to be administered 1-on-1 for students, as appropriate, by a licensed psychologist(s).
Private testing guidelines (adopted in 2010-2011)
The following are current DJUSD private testing guidelines.
If a parent/student is seeking private testing by a licensed psychologist (test of mental reasoning), he/she must have an appointment, and then the family needs to obtain a Request for Outside Testing Form from the district prior to the appointment. The Request for Outside Testing Form is presented to the evaluator who must complete the affidavit that the evaluator only gave that test (and all sub tests) and that the student has not taken the test before. Students may take only one test from an outside evaluator per year. All testing result—accompanied by the signed Outside Evaluation Form may then be submitted to the district for consideration. (All local psychologists and CSUS know about the policy and will not test students if a form is not presented. Students who are identified in a previous district (either by private or district testing) will maintain their AIM identification so long as their scores meet the DJUSD criteria.
|
| |
| None at this time. |
|
|
The Board of Trustees will receive the recently completed AIM (Magnet Program) study that was conducted by UC Davis researchers.
This item is presented for information and discussion.
|
Following a 2013 discussion about the AIM/GATE lottery process the DJUSD Board of Trustees requested a study of DJUSD Magnet programs to better understand their effectiveness and impact on student outcomes. In response, DJUSD entered an MOU with UC researchers Scott Carrell and Marianne Page from UC Davis' School of Economics and Michal Kurlaender from UC Davis' School of Education to conduct a study of magnet programs, beginning with the DJUSD AIM program. The researchers donated their time and resources to conduct the study and completed the first phase in May 2015.
The researcher's analysis explores the following three questions:
1. Who is GATE/AIM identified in the Davis Joint Unified School District and how has this changed over time?
2. What is the causal impact of the AIM program on student academic achievement for students in the AIM program?
3. What are the causal effects of AIM on students not in AIM?
The study's written summary is divided into 6 sections that include:
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Data
4. Methods & Results
a. AIM Qualification and Program Participation
b. Academic Achievement Effects of AIM on Students in AIM
c. Academic Achievement Effects of AIM on Students not in AIM
5. Conclusion
6. References
Visual descriptions of the researched findings are represented through tables, charts and graphs.
The full study and the MOU are provided as backup attachments.
|
| |
This study did not have a financial impact on the DJUSD. The UC Davis researchers donated their time and resources to provide this service.
|
AIM (Magnet Program) Study
MOU DJUSD.UCD
PowerPoint Presentation
|
|
|
Review and discuss the impact of the May Revise Budget Update.
|
The updated State budget proposal has substantial funding changes for K-12 local district funding compared to the January proposal. The Governor's budget continues to increase the proposed revenue to fund the new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and payback mandated cost claims as one-time discretionary funds. For 2015-16, the proposed budget contains funding for LCFF growth that calculates to $5m of on-going new funding and $4.6m in one-time discretionary funds. This is great news. - The District has developed a spending plan that addresses the following needs: - Employee compensation
- State mandated programs
- Restricted maintenance
- Pension rate increases (STRS & PERS)
- Supplemental student programs (LCAP specific)
- Class Size
- Local programs
- Budget deficit
- Other LCAP priorities
While this is great news, it marks a high point in the K-12 education budget from Proposition 30 temporary State taxes and Proposition 98 restoration due to past reductions (maintenance factor). These two factors going forward will slow down the high revenue growth we have seen this year and projected for next year. Staff will provide a summary report of the Governor's May revise and possible impacts on DJUSD.
|
| |
Budget PowerPoint Presentation
LCAP Cabinet Recommendations - May 29, 2015
May Revise Budget Update
Yolo Common Message - May Revise 2015
|
|
|
Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the tax rate adjustment for Community Facilities District No. 1.
|
Under the provisions of the resolution establishing Community Facilities District No. 1 (CFD No. 1), the Board of Education is granted the authority to adjust the CFD No. 1 tax rate by a maximum of 4.63% per annum. The purpose of the hearing is to allow the public to comment on the proposed adjustment of 4.63% to the current CFD No. 1 tax rate of $198.52. The proposed rate when adjusted would amount to $207.72 per special tax unit.
Subsequent to the public hearing, the Board of Education will be asked, as a separate action, to approve the change in the tax rate.
|
| |
There is no impact to the General Fund. Estimated revenue increase to restricted Facilities District Fund is $200,000 to be used for debt service payments.
|
|
|
Approve the proposed adjustment of 4.63% to the current community Facilities District No. 1 tax rate which, when adjusted, will amount to $207.72 per special tax unit.
|
As indicated in the Public Hearing regarding the proposed adjustment, under the provisions of the resolution establishing Community Facilities District No. 1 (CFD No. 1), the Board of Education is granted the authority to adjust the CFD No. 1 tax rate by a maximum of 4.63% per annum. The proposed rate when adjusted would amount to $207.72 per special tax unit. In accordance with the resolution establishing CFD No. 1, a public hearing has already been held to provide opportunity for public comments.
A Facilities Plan has been discussed and approved in prior public Board meetings. The projected cost components are based on an estimated revenue stream from CFD No. 1. This revenue stream is estimated with full appreciation of the tax rate during the life span of the Facilities Plan.
The projected tax revenue stream has been encumbered to cover outstanding debt obligations.
It is requested that the Board of Education approve the adjustment of the tax rate levied by CFD No. 1.
|
| |
There is no impact to the General Fund. Estimated revenue increase to restricted Facilities District Fund is $200,000 to be used for debt service payments.
|
|
|
Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the tax rate adjustment for Community Facilities District No. 2.
|
Under the provisions of the resolution establishing Community Facilities District No. 2 (CFD No. 2), the Board of Education is granted the authority to adjust the CFD No. 2 tax rates by a maximum of 4.63% per annum. The purpose of the hearing is to allow the public to comment on the proposed adjustment of 4.63% to the current CFD No. 2 tax rate of $.5926 per square foot of space for residential property and $.0888 per square foot of commercial property. The proposed adjustment would increase the rates to $.6200 per square foot of assessable space for future residential property and $.0930 per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space for future commercial and industrial property.
Subsequent to the public hearing, the Board of Education will be asked, as a separate action, to approve the change in the tax rate.
|
| |
| There is no impact to the General Fund. Increased tax rate only impacts annexed developments that have not been built and assessed. Revenue will support future facility costs. |
|
|
Approve the proposed adjustment of 4.63% to the current Community Facilities District No. 2 tax rates which, when adjusted, will amount to $.6200 per square foot of assessable space for residential property and $.0930 per square foot of chargeable space for commercial and industrial property.
|
As indicated in the Public Hearing regarding the proposed adjustment, under the provisions of the resolution establishing Community Facilities District No. 2 (CFD No. 2), the Board of Education is granted the authority to adjust the CFD No. 2 tax rates by a maximum of 4.63% per annum. The purpose of the hearing was to allow the public to comment on the proposed adjustment of 4.63% to the current CFD No. 2 tax rate of $.5926 per square foot of space for residential property and $.0888 per square foot of commercial property. The proposed adjustment would increase the rates to $.6200 per square foot of assessable space for residential property and $.0930 per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space for commercial and industrial property.
A Facilities Plan has been discussed and approved in prior public Board meetings. The projected cost components are based on an estimated revenue stream from CFD No. 2. This revenue stream is estimated with full appreciation of the tax rate during the life span of the Facilities Plan.
It is requested that the Board of Education approve the adjustment of the tax rate levied by CFD No. 2.
|
| |
There is no impact to the General Fund. Increased tax rate only impacts annexed developments that have not been built and assessed. Revenue will support future facility costs.
|
|
|
Hold Public Hearing to receive comments regarding the 2015-2016 Measure C tax rate.
|
In March 2012, the District's voters approved an annual tax of $150.00 per unit for multi-dwelling units and $320.00 per parcel for all other parcels to augment the financing for certain school programs. The resolution authorizing the tax (copy attached) calls for a public hearing prior to the assessment of the tax each fiscal year.
The rate was adjusted in 2013-2014 in accordance with the Parcel Tax Measure’s adjustment for annual inflation. The adjustment increased the annual tax from $150.00 to $153.30 per unit for multi-dwelling units and $320.00 to $327.04 per parcel for all other parcels which are the current rates. Rates were not adjusted for annual inflation in the 2014-15 fiscal year.
The district has the authority to increase the rates based on the latest California Price Index figures. The rates can be increased by 1.3% to $155.29 per unit for multi-dwelling units and $331.29 per parcel for all other parcels.
|
| |
Possible increase in local parcel tax revenue of approximately $83,000.
|
California Consumer Price Indices May 2015
Resolution 35-12 Measure C
|
|
|
Approve the parcel tax rates for Measure C at current rates or inflation adjusted rates.
|
As indicated in the Public Hearing, under the provisions of the resolution setting forth the specifications of the Measure C parcel tax, the Board of Education must conduct a public hearing and then approve the tax rate annually. The public hearing was held on June 4, 2015 prior to the Board action.
The current projected revenue for the 2015-2016 fiscal year is approximately $6.4 million and does not include any rate changes. The current parcel tax (Measure C) rates are $153.30 per unit for multi-dwelling units and $327.04 per parcel for all other parcels. The Board of Education can approve the parcel tax (Measure C) rates up to $155.29 per unit for multi-dwelling units and $331.29 per parcel for all other parcels.
|
| |
Possible increase in local parcel tax revenue of approximately $83,000.
|
|
|
Hold Public Hearing to receive comments regarding the 2015-2016 Measure E tax rate.
|
In November 2012, the District's voters approved an annual tax of $20.00 per dwelling unit for multi-dwelling parcels and $204.00 per parcel for all other parcels, to augment the financing for certain school programs. The resolution authorizing the tax (copy attached) calls for a public hearing prior to the assessment of the tax each fiscal year.
Due to a court decision, Resolution No. 24-14 was passed in August 2013 (copy attached) authorizing an annual tax of $204.00 per parcel of taxable real property.
The district has the authority to increase the rate in accordance with the Parcel Tax Measure’s adjustment for annual inflation based on the latest California Price Index figures. Rates were not adjusted for annual inflation in the 2014-15 fiscal year. The current rate can be increased by 1.3% to $206.65 per parcel of taxable real property.
|
| |
Possible increase in local parcel tax revenue of approximately $40,000.
|
California Consumer Price Indices May 2015
Resolution 24-14 Measure E
Resolution 59-12 Measure E
|
|
|
Approve the parcel tax rates for Measure E at current rate or inflation adjusted rate.
|
As indicated in the Public Hearing, under the provisions of the resolution setting forth the specifications of the Measure E parcel tax, the Board of Education must conduct a public hearing and then approve the tax rate annually. The public hearing was held on June 4, 2015 prior to the Board action.
The current projected revenue for the 2015-2016 fiscal year is approximately $3.1 million and does not include any rate change. The current parcel tax (Measure E) rate is $204.00 per parcel of taxable real property. The Board of Education can approve the parcel tax (Measure E) rate up to $206.65 per parcel of taxable real property.
|
| |
Possible increase in local parcel tax revenue of approximately $40,000.
|
|
|
| The calendar is a fluid, working document used by the Board President and Superintendent in support of the Board conducting efficient and effective Board meetings. Changes in the date of future agenda items occur frequently to best fit Board items into the time parameters of Board meetings and District priorities. |
| |
|
Tentative Calendar
|
|
|
| The next meeting of the Board of Education is scheduled for June 18, 2015. The Board will convene in open session, and immediately thereafter adjourn to closed session at 5:30 p.m. in the Susan B. Anthony Administration Building at 526 B Street, Davis, California. The Board will reconvene in open session at approximately 7:00 p.m. in the Community Chambers at 23 Russell Boulevard, Davis, California. |
|
|